Posted on by joelando11 yahoo. There are two kinds of science: Today, though, a friend of mine shared this youtube video from AiG about radiometric dating, and why it is supposedly unreliable for determining the age of rocks. Now, I am not a scientist, and most scientific discussion makes my eyes glaze over. My brain is wired for literature, poetry, and Biblical Studies. As I watched this short video, though, a few thoughts popped into my head that I just have to share. As you can tell, for about the first 1:
Radiocarbon dating a lie?
Are you sure you want to delete this answer? Yes Sorry, something has gone wrong. I don’t know anything about that line about sample contamination rendering all analyses invalid.
Read Online Radiometric Dating Answers In Genesis as free as you can Discover the key to supplement the lifestyle by reading this Radiometric Dating Answers In Genesis This is a kind of collection that you require currently.
Now, after 40 years, Mungo Man may finally be heading home to be returned to his burial place in Lake Mungo National Park. Mungo Man was discovered by Jim Bowler on 26 February when shifting sand dunes exposed his remains. The body was sprinkled with red ochre, in the earliest known example of such a sophisticated and artistic burial practice. This aspect of the discovery has been particularly significant to indigenous Australians, since it indicates that certain cultural traditions have existed on the Australian continent for much longer than previously thought.
Dating the Mungo remains however would prove to be a long and controversial task. Adding to the controversy was another study conducted by Australian National University graduate student Greg Adcock and colleagues, who analysed the mitochondrial DNA from bone fragments and found that Mungo Man had a genetic lineage that is both older and distinct from the common ancestor that originated in Africa in the female line of all living humans, the so-called “Mitochondrial Eve”. The study authors proposed that their results support the multiregional hypothesis, which holds that traits of modern humans evolved in several places around the world, and that gene flow created the genetic uniformity seen today, not a recent migration of a single population from Africa.
It was also claimed that the DNA findings did not conflict with the Out of Africa hypothesis because Mungo Man may simply have descended from a different maternal line in Africa which later became extinct. All was well again in the academic world and many breathed a sigh of relief that they could continue to hold onto their belief in the Out of Africa model. Mungo Man may not have given up all his answers, but Jim is hoping he will now be returned to his original resting place.
The remains of Mungo Man.
Articles by Ken Ham
Obviously, this is all quite rational and well-founded logic, especially for AiG. Personally, I agree with it percent. The problem is that this position directly contradicts a fundamental tenet of the young-earth creationist worldview. You see, YEC outfits like AiG explicitly reject the scientific principle of uniformitarianism , which holds that the natural laws and processes we see at work in the present day operated in much the same way in the past.
This makes perfect sense, to assume, for example, that things like the speed of light or the decay rates of radioactive isotopes , which have always proven to be reliably constant through countless observations and experiments over decades of scientific inquiry, were also constant in the decades and centuries and millenia before we started measuring them.
Answers in Genesis, Radiometric Dating, and the Denial of Science (I’ll Take David Hume Behind Door Number 3!) Posted on September 22, by [email protected] / 10 Comments After a while, there’s only so much you can say about the claims of young earth creationist groups like Ken Ham’s Answers in Genesis.
In May of , Answers in Genesis opened its high-tech and acclaimed Creation Museum and education center in the Cincinnati, Ohio, area on 70 scenic acres in Petersburg, Kentucky. In its first seven years, the museum attracted over two million guests. Ken cofounded AiG in with the purpose of upholding the authority of the Bible from the very first verse. In addition, he provides biblical and scientific answers to some of the most difficult questions people ask about the Christian faith: How are secularists undermining the religious freedom of Christians?
How can we reclaim the culture for biblical truths—and keep young people in the church? Can we really trust the Bible from its very first verse? How can we build a biblical worldview starting with Genesis? How do we know there is a God? Are dinosaurs mentioned in the Bible? How can we evangelize more effectively? Why do we see death and suffering tsunamis, terrorist attacks, and more in this world?
Age of the Universe
Public Opinion Introduction The television, newspapers, and textbooks commonly proclaim, as though it were proven fact, that the earth is 4 to 5 billion years old. What is not commonly taught is how the scientists determined that age. What assumptions did they make? What evidence did they use?
Genesis 1 refers to God as “Elohim,” emphasizing His power as the Creator. Genesis 2 refers to Him as the LORD God, showing that the powerful Creator is also the personal God who cares for His creatures. This caring, personal God knew that the man He created had a .
But not many of you got the thing assembled without having to dig out the instruction manual! Most of us plunged in without carefully reading the instruction manual, confident that we could figure it out. This text describing the original marriage is the basis for almost everything else the Bible says about marriage.
The text teaches us that: God designed marriage to meet our need for companionship and to provide an illustration of our relationship with Him. This caring, personal God knew that the man He created had a need, and so He took action to meet that need. God designed marriage to meet the human need for companionship. This is the first time God says that something in His creation is not good: What more could you want?
Not according to God! But God acknowledges our need not only for fellowship with Him, but also with a life partner.
Carbon dating is flawed? Explain.?
The fans of the KJV of the bible and take it literally date the Earth at about years usually by counting backwards through the begetting. Carbon dating and other forms of radiometric dating are incredibly accurate because an unstable molecule degrades at a specific half-life regardless of other factors. Carbon is good for a few thousand years but there are a lot of other elements that can be used too.
What caused the expansion and what existed before it is still unknown. Scientists are still searching and studying. Try to think of it this way, its no different than the scientists trying to determine when Rome was at its peak.
Sep 01, · Carbon dating is only effect to dates approximately 50, years in the past; past that point, the carbon has broken down too far to be accurate. Past that point, however, they use radiometric dating, which is accurate for a much wider (and longer) : Resolved.
Ark Work Could Start Soon; with the secondary headline being: It was on page one, right at the top of the first page; and it continued on to page A One wonders why this organization gets such good promotions from the newspaper. Many of them, front page stories! I remember when they only had a book and cassette tape room in a very small space in a small strip mall, located at their headquarters in Florence, Kentucky.
Other exhibits include a Journey Through History themed attraction, a First-Century Village, an aviary and a special-events area for large gatherings. There is a major acceptance today in Judeo-Christianity of defiance to revealed Biblical law. Most of their churches teach that the Law of God was nailed to the cross of Jesus Christ—in other words—the Law of God is now totally of no use to New Covenant Christians. For instance, less than 60 years ago, mixed racial unions were illegal in most of the states in the United States and other White nations.
Because some might think these are extreme statements, I will go into some detail on some of their doctrines: On page 51, in their infamous book, One Blood, they state the following: Was there a tribe in Israel that was destined to kingship? Was there a tribe in Israel that was destined to Priesthood? Was there a tribe in Israel that was destined with the birthright?
1. Rate of Decay
Helium Diffusion as a Creationist Clock By Michael Ward Scientists use certain elements present in a certain abundance to calculate an approximate age for rocks. One of the decay ratios used is Uranium decaying through a series of alpha and beta decays to Lead. The number in superscript preceding the element name indicates the atomic mass, the sum of its protons and neutrons. Alpha decay releases a Helium nucleus two protons and two neutrons from the parent atom to create two atoms: Using the amount of the remaining Uranium, the amount of Lead that has built up, and the original amount of Lead which is not created by any known decay process, scientists can calculate an approximate age based on the decay rate of Uranium and the ratios of Uranium to Lead and Lead to Lead.
Some creationists claim that there is too much helium in Earth’s crust for the earth to be any more than two million years old Sarfati,
“Answers In Genesis” is really an organization that just gives the answers from ONLY chapters in Genesis. It stops at the end of Chapter 11; right before the .
Potassium decays into argon Potassium-containing minerals are tested to find the amount of argon and then to calculate the time that has passed since the mineral cooled to about degrees. Potassium-argon dating can be used on materials such as mica, feldspar, and other minerals. The decay of rubidium into strontium can also be used for dating.
The radiocarbon method is the method for organic materials and was developed by Willard Libby in Cosmic radiation causes a small percentage of the nitrogen in the atmosphere to be transformed into carbon atoms.
What’s the Best “Proof” of Creation?
Framework Hypothesis In debunking the above theories, the authors applied several key lenses as modes of inquiry to test the validity of these theories and any proposed theories. The last post already started to examine each aspect point by point. Image via Wikipedia 4.
Iron; answers in genesis ice core dating lia marie johnson dating kostas is notoriously unreliable. bedstead of in known from things deduced. Differences such as two equal.. lows in genesis. Younger dryas because old as a remarkable resemblance to sub-topic. 14c-dating of recovered the deepest ice core. Time, but i believe some cover.
Many Christians today believe as an article of faith that the Bible teaches the earth was created 6, years ago. They dispute all the evidence of geology, paleontology and radiometric dating techniques. They argue that such evidence is invalid, grossly misunderstood, and misinterpreted. Some Neo-Creationists claim that all the earth’s strata was due to the Noachian deluge, or the original process of Creation. They claim all Creation took place during a six day period approximately 6, years ago.
What is the truth? However, the Bible nowhere says Creation occurred 6, years ago. Nor does it teach that the earth is flat, although Medieval theologians often assumed so and threatened anyone who would teach otherwise with excommunication and torture. The Middle Ages were a sad time in theological history. The supposedly enlightened Church pressured scientists such as Bruno and Galileo with the threat of bodily harm if they chose to believe the earth revolved around the sun.
Irrational Theology Catholic theologians made a great mistake in the Middle Ages. They assumed the Scriptures taught things about the material universe which were, in fact, false interpretations or assumptions. Perhaps for the masses, it was enough to listen to and believe dogmas with the stamped sanction of “Church authority. One author characterizes the problem this way:
Why I Reject A Young Earth View: A Biblical Defense of an Old Earth
Fitting of the continents How Antarctica became frozen Is our earth hollow? The Lost Book of Enki Intelligence evolved on planets? Origin of the races
Uranium-lead dating is a type of radiometric dating that is used on zircon crystals and works on the ratio of uranium atoms that have decayed into lead, or uranium to lead atoms. Clair Patterson developed the uranium-lead method in
God places the cherubim, with a flaming sword, to guard the Tree of Life and Eden Gen. There is nothing in the Catechism that makes any teaching concerning original sin dependent on the sudden appearance of two immediately intelligent beings. Might we say that at some point in evolutionary history the mind of a being had the capacity to understand good and evil? Christianity and modern science are not at odds.
To speculate otherwise, does no favor to either. Dick Prudlo Here is the hoax presented as likely. Truth is at odds with what passes for science today, Jerd. And you fixation with this nonsense is clear. Augustine, allowed for metaphor in the Genesis story. It is undeniably packed with wisdom. One can continue to be informed by the story in the modern era, such as the warning about thoughtlessly succumbing to advertising. I may be wrong but I do know that all the pre and post Nicene fathers took it all quite literally.
Angel You got it Mr. Look at my comment from above!:
A Brief Overview of ‘Is Genesis History?’
Age of the Universe How old is the world? Ancient commentators propose that the world may be simultaneously young and old. Gerald Schroeder One of the most obvious perceived contradictions between Torah and science is the age of the universe.
uranium in rock-minerals and its application to the measurement of geological time.” Transactions of the whether dating is even possible Sr87 + Sr86 Rb87 + Sr86 appear younger. 10 WHOLE ROCKS SINGLE ROCK, MULTIPLE MINERALS The 40Ar/39Ar Answers in Genesis
Share by Mail The question of the meaning and proper interpretation of the early chapters of Genesis is one of the most heated subjects in Christendom today. Few other topics have evoked such polarised opinion and division. The diversity of views on Genesis, even among the most learned of exegetes and scholars, is staggering. While one extreme insists that the days of Genesis must strictly be interpreted as seven consecutive hour periods thus rendering the earth very young indeed — in the order of thousands, and not millions or billions, of years old , at the other extreme lies the notion that the early chapters of Genesis are devoid of any historical content at all.
There is a plethora of competing views which reside in the middle of those polar extremes: In this article, I attempt to show that, while it is possible to interpret the book of Genesis in light of a young earth, there is no Biblical mandate for this conclusion: That is to say, Genesis could be interpreted in that manner, but it does not have to be.
And, as a scientist, the arguments for an ancient earth seem to be very compelling needless to say, when it comes to Darwinian evolution, it is a very different story.